The results show that the deep learning-based algorithm performs best, followed by the machine learning-based algorithm and the image processing-based algorithm. The results also show that the performance of each algorithm varies under different crack conditions, highlighting the importance of evaluating algorithms using a comprehensive benchmark.
The results of the verification study are presented in Tables 1-3, which show the performance of each algorithm under different crack conditions. superposition benchmark crack verified
Future work will focus on expanding the benchmark dataset to include more crack scenarios and background images. Additionally, we plan to investigate the use of our benchmark for evaluating the performance of other materials science-related algorithms, such as those for detecting defects and corrosion. The results show that the deep learning-based algorithm
| Algorithm | Precision | Recall | F1-score | MAP | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Image processing-based | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.75 | 0.85 | | Machine learning-based | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.85 | 0.9 | | Deep learning-based | 0.95 | 0.9 | 0.925 | 0.95 | Future work will focus on expanding the benchmark
The results show that the deep learning-based algorithm performs best, followed by the machine learning-based algorithm and the image processing-based algorithm. The results also show that the performance of each algorithm varies under different crack conditions, highlighting the importance of evaluating algorithms using a comprehensive benchmark.
The results of the verification study are presented in Tables 1-3, which show the performance of each algorithm under different crack conditions.
Future work will focus on expanding the benchmark dataset to include more crack scenarios and background images. Additionally, we plan to investigate the use of our benchmark for evaluating the performance of other materials science-related algorithms, such as those for detecting defects and corrosion.
| Algorithm | Precision | Recall | F1-score | MAP | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Image processing-based | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.75 | 0.85 | | Machine learning-based | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.85 | 0.9 | | Deep learning-based | 0.95 | 0.9 | 0.925 | 0.95 |